Who GB should take — each prospect's model grade, weighted up where the roster is thin, so highly graded players at positions GB needs rise to the top.
| Rank↑ | Player | Fit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colin Simmonsrank#4$14.9M EDGEBlue Chip· Texas· model #4· critical need | 0.85 |
| 2 | Jeremiah Smithrank#1$19.7M WRBlue Chip· Ohio State· model #1 | 0.79 |
| 3 | Leonard Moorerank#2$19M CBBlue Chip· Notre Dame· model #2 | 0.79 |
| 4 | Trevor Goosbyrank#3$15.3M OTBlue Chip· Texas· model #3 | 0.79 |
| 5 | Dante Moorerank#7 QB1st Round· Oregon· model #7 | 0.77 |
| 6 | Jordan Seatonrank#5$13.3M OTBlue Chip· LSU· model #5 | 0.77 |
| 7 | Cam Colemanrank#6$17.8M WRBlue Chip· Texas· model #6 | 0.76 |
| 8 | William Echolesrank#9$15.1M DL1st Round· Ole Miss· model #9 | 0.76 |
| 9 | KJ Boldenrank#8$23.8M S1st Round· Georgia· model #8 | 0.76 |
| 10 | Arch Manningrank#11 QB1st Round· Texas· model #11 | 0.73 |
| 11 | Ryan Williamsrank#10$19.3M WR1st Round· Alabama· model #10 | 0.72 |
| 12 | Dylan Stewartrank#24$23.5M EDGE1st Round· South Carolina· model #24· critical need | 0.70 |
| 13 | Kyngstonn Viliamu-Asarank#12$19.1M LB1st Round· Notre Dame· model #12 | 0.70 |
| 14 | David Stonerank#19$16.7M DL1st Round· Oklahoma· model #19 | 0.68 |
| 15 | Cayden Greenrank#13$11.8M OT1st Round· Missouri· model #13 | 0.67 |
| 16 | Julian Sayinrank#14 QB1st Round· Ohio State· model #14 | 0.67 |
| 17 | Rasheem Bilesrank#15$13.1M LB1st Round· Texas· model #15 | 0.65 |
| 18 | Kewan Lacyrank#17$13.6M RB1st Round· Ole Miss· model #17 | 0.65 |
| 19 | OT1st Round· Iowa· model #16 | 0.65 |
| 20 | A'Mauri Washingtonrank#27$17M DL1st Round· Oregon· model #27 | 0.65 |
| 21 | C1st Round· Iowa· model #18 | 0.64 |
| 22 | Jadan Baughrank#23$9.6M RB1st Round· Florida· model #23 | 0.64 |
| 23 | G1st Round· Ohio State· model #20 | 0.64 |
| 24 | Jamari Johnsonrank#21$20.7M TE1st Round· Oregon· model #21 | 0.64 |
| 25 | S1st Round· Oregon· model #22 | 0.63 |
| 26 | Quincy Rhodes Jr.rank#31$15.5M DL1st Round· Arkansas· model #31 | 0.62 |
| 27 | CB1st Round· Miami· model #25 | 0.62 |
| 28 | CB1st Round· Illinois· model #26 | 0.61 |
| 29 | LaNorris Sellersrank#29 QB1st Round· South Carolina· model #29 | 0.61 |
| 30 | Ryan Wingorank#28$23.1M WR1st Round· Texas· model #28 | 0.60 |
| 31 | Adam Trickrank#30$16.7M LB1st Round· Texas Tech· model #30 | 0.60 |
| 32 | Damon Wilson IIrank#53$10.7M EDGEDay 2· Miami· model #53· critical need | 0.59 |
| 33 | Nate Frazierrank#33$9.8M RBDay 2· Georgia· model #33 | 0.58 |
| 34 | Will Heldtrank#58$14.1M EDGEDay 2· Clemson· model #58· critical need | 0.58 |
| 35 | Ellis Robinson IVrank#32$7M CB1st Round· Georgia· model #32 | 0.58 |
| 36 | Sammy Brownrank#34$10M LBDay 2· Clemson· model #34 | 0.58 |
| 37 | QBDay 2· LSU· model #37 | 0.58 |
| 38 | WRDay 2· Arizona State· model #35 | 0.57 |
| 39 | Nick Marshrank#36$17.9M WRDay 2· Indiana· model #36 | 0.57 |
| 40 | EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #66· critical need | 0.57 |
| 41 | Wyatt Youngrank#38$8.5M WRDay 2· Oklahoma State· model #38 | 0.56 |
| 42 | Boubacar Traorerank#50$13.9M DLDay 2· Notre Dame· model #50 | 0.56 |
| 43 | CBDay 2· Alabama· model #39 | 0.55 |
| 44 | Ethan Wesloskirank#40$11.9M LBDay 2· Oklahoma State· model #40 | 0.55 |
| 45 | CBDay 2· Texas· model #41 | 0.55 |
| 46 | J'Mond Tapprank#90$8.3M EDGEDay 2· Memphis· model #90· critical need | 0.55 |
| 47 | EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #91· critical need | 0.54 |
| 48 | LBDay 2· Penn State· model #42 | 0.54 |
| 49 | DLDay 2· Michigan State· model #61 | 0.54 |
| 50 | Darian Mensahrank#47 QBDay 2· Miami· model #47 | 0.54 |
LaFleur WCO; Hafley match zone (Boston College lineage)
What GB has committed against the projected NFL salary cap, year by year. Room-to-add is the headline number for evaluating their ability to extend rookies or chase free agents.
Green Bay's house mock sends Ian Moore at pick 59, and the model backs it hard — 56th overall, addressing the offensive line hole up front. The room isn't nearly as sold, slotting the Ohio State guard 116th, a 60-spot gap that's tough to ignore given his 22% bust rate. Compare that to Mario Craver, where model and room sit just four spots apart — total agreement. Green Bay's front office is banking on medical or scheme fit the market hasn't priced in, but if Moore busts, this is the pick that draws the retrospective grief.
Written by our models from the live board, and reconciled against it
Prospects re-ranked for GB's offensive and defensive scheme. Green = climbed on this team's board; red = dropped. The base board is unchanged — this is a derived view.