Who SF should take — each prospect's model grade, weighted up where the roster is thin, so highly graded players at positions SF needs rise to the top.
| Rank↑ | Player | Fit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colin Simmonsrank#4$14.9M EDGEBlue Chip· Texas· model #4· critical need | 0.85 |
| 2 | Jeremiah Smithrank#1$19.7M WRBlue Chip· Ohio State· model #1 | 0.83 |
| 3 | Trevor Goosbyrank#3$15.3M OTBlue Chip· Texas· model #3 | 0.80 |
| 4 | Cam Colemanrank#6$17.8M WRBlue Chip· Texas· model #6 | 0.80 |
| 5 | Jordan Seatonrank#5$13.3M OTBlue Chip· LSU· model #5 | 0.79 |
| 6 | Leonard Moorerank#2$19M CBBlue Chip· Notre Dame· model #2 | 0.79 |
| 7 | Dante Moorerank#7 QB1st Round· Oregon· model #7 | 0.76 |
| 8 | KJ Boldenrank#8$23.8M S1st Round· Georgia· model #8 | 0.76 |
| 9 | Ryan Williamsrank#10$19.3M WR1st Round· Alabama· model #10 | 0.75 |
| 10 | William Echolesrank#9$15.1M DL1st Round· Ole Miss· model #9 | 0.73 |
| 11 | Arch Manningrank#11 QB1st Round· Texas· model #11 | 0.72 |
| 12 | Kyngstonn Viliamu-Asarank#12$19.1M LB1st Round· Notre Dame· model #12 | 0.71 |
| 13 | Dylan Stewartrank#24$23.5M EDGE1st Round· South Carolina· model #24· critical need | 0.70 |
| 14 | Cayden Greenrank#13$11.8M OT1st Round· Missouri· model #13 | 0.69 |
| 15 | OT1st Round· Iowa· model #16 | 0.67 |
| 16 | Kewan Lacyrank#17$13.6M RB1st Round· Ole Miss· model #17 | 0.66 |
| 17 | Julian Sayinrank#14 QB1st Round· Ohio State· model #14 | 0.66 |
| 18 | C1st Round· Iowa· model #18 | 0.66 |
| 19 | Rasheem Bilesrank#15$13.1M LB1st Round· Texas· model #15 | 0.65 |
| 20 | Jadan Baughrank#23$9.6M RB1st Round· Florida· model #23 | 0.65 |
| 21 | Jamari Johnsonrank#21$20.7M TE1st Round· Oregon· model #21 | 0.65 |
| 22 | David Stonerank#19$16.7M DL1st Round· Oklahoma· model #19 | 0.64 |
| 23 | G1st Round· Ohio State· model #20 | 0.64 |
| 24 | Ryan Wingorank#28$23.1M WR1st Round· Texas· model #28 | 0.64 |
| 25 | S1st Round· Oregon· model #22 | 0.63 |
| 26 | CB1st Round· Miami· model #25 | 0.62 |
| 27 | CB1st Round· Illinois· model #26 | 0.61 |
| 28 | A'Mauri Washingtonrank#27$17M DL1st Round· Oregon· model #27 | 0.61 |
| 29 | WRDay 2· Arizona State· model #35 | 0.61 |
| 30 | Nick Marshrank#36$17.9M WRDay 2· Indiana· model #36 | 0.61 |
| 31 | LaNorris Sellersrank#29 QB1st Round· South Carolina· model #29 | 0.60 |
| 32 | Adam Trickrank#30$16.7M LB1st Round· Texas Tech· model #30 | 0.60 |
| 33 | Nate Frazierrank#33$9.8M RBDay 2· Georgia· model #33 | 0.60 |
| 34 | Wyatt Youngrank#38$8.5M WRDay 2· Oklahoma State· model #38 | 0.60 |
| 35 | Damon Wilson IIrank#53$10.7M EDGEDay 2· Miami· model #53· critical need | 0.59 |
| 36 | Quincy Rhodes Jr.rank#31$15.5M DL1st Round· Arkansas· model #31 | 0.59 |
| 37 | Will Heldtrank#58$14.1M EDGEDay 2· Clemson· model #58· critical need | 0.58 |
| 38 | Ellis Robinson IVrank#32$7M CB1st Round· Georgia· model #32 | 0.58 |
| 39 | Sammy Brownrank#34$10M LBDay 2· Clemson· model #34 | 0.58 |
| 40 | QBDay 2· LSU· model #37 | 0.57 |
| 41 | EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #66· critical need | 0.57 |
| 42 | Ethan Wesloskirank#40$11.9M LBDay 2· Oklahoma State· model #40 | 0.56 |
| 43 | CBDay 2· Alabama· model #39 | 0.55 |
| 44 | CBDay 2· Texas· model #41 | 0.55 |
| 45 | LBDay 2· Penn State· model #42 | 0.55 |
| 46 | J'Mond Tapprank#90$8.3M EDGEDay 2· Memphis· model #90· critical need | 0.55 |
| 47 | Mark Fletcher Jr.rank#49$6.3M RBDay 2· Miami· model #49 | 0.54 |
| 48 | EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #91· critical need | 0.54 |
| 49 | WRDay 2· Texas A&M· model #60 | 0.54 |
| 50 | SDay 2· Clemson· model #43 | 0.54 |
Shanahan WCO; Saleh-tree match zone
What SF has committed against the projected NFL salary cap, year by year. Room-to-add is the headline number for evaluating their ability to extend rookies or chase free agents.
San Francisco's board reads defensive front, offensive line, secondary — yet the house mock hands them Adam Trick at 26, a linebacker nobody outside the model wanted. He sits 30th on the model, 184th in the room, a gap that dwarfs everything else here. Compare that to Dylan Stewart, the edge rusher who actually addresses SF's top need: the room ranks him far higher than the model does. If the Niners want defensive-front help, Stewart's sitting right where they pick. Trick isn't.
Written by our models from the live board, and reconciled against it
Prospects re-ranked for SF's offensive and defensive scheme. Green = climbed on this team's board; red = dropped. The base board is unchanged — this is a derived view.