Who LV should take — each prospect's model grade, weighted up where the roster is thin, so highly graded players at positions LV needs rise to the top.
| Rank↑ | Player | Fit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trevor Goosbyrank#3$15.3M OTBlue Chip· Texas· model #3· critical need | 0.86 |
| 2 | Colin Simmonsrank#4$14.9M EDGEBlue Chip· Texas· model #4· critical need | 0.85 |
| 3 | Jordan Seatonrank#5$13.3M OTBlue Chip· LSU· model #5· critical need | 0.84 |
| 4 | Dante Moorerank#7 QB1st Round· Oregon· model #7· critical need | 0.84 |
| 5 | Leonard Moorerank#2$19M CBBlue Chip· Notre Dame· model #2 | 0.81 |
| 6 | Jeremiah Smithrank#1$19.7M WRBlue Chip· Ohio State· model #1 | 0.79 |
| 7 | Arch Manningrank#11 QB1st Round· Texas· model #11· critical need | 0.79 |
| 8 | Cam Colemanrank#6$17.8M WRBlue Chip· Texas· model #6 | 0.76 |
| 9 | KJ Boldenrank#8$23.8M S1st Round· Georgia· model #8 | 0.76 |
| 10 | Cayden Greenrank#13$11.8M OT1st Round· Missouri· model #13· critical need | 0.75 |
| 11 | Kyngstonn Viliamu-Asarank#12$19.1M LB1st Round· Notre Dame· model #12 | 0.74 |
| 12 | Julian Sayinrank#14 QB1st Round· Ohio State· model #14· critical need | 0.74 |
| 13 | William Echolesrank#9$15.1M DL1st Round· Ole Miss· model #9 | 0.73 |
| 14 | OT1st Round· Iowa· model #16· critical need | 0.72 |
| 15 | Ryan Williamsrank#10$19.3M WR1st Round· Alabama· model #10 | 0.72 |
| 16 | G1st Round· Ohio State· model #20· critical need | 0.71 |
| 17 | Dylan Stewartrank#24$23.5M EDGE1st Round· South Carolina· model #24· critical need | 0.70 |
| 18 | Rasheem Bilesrank#15$13.1M LB1st Round· Texas· model #15 | 0.69 |
| 19 | LaNorris Sellersrank#29 QB1st Round· South Carolina· model #29· critical need | 0.68 |
| 20 | David Stonerank#19$16.7M DL1st Round· Oklahoma· model #19 | 0.64 |
| 21 | Kewan Lacyrank#17$13.6M RB1st Round· Ole Miss· model #17 | 0.64 |
| 22 | C1st Round· Iowa· model #18 | 0.64 |
| 23 | QBDay 2· LSU· model #37· critical need | 0.64 |
| 24 | CB1st Round· Miami· model #25 | 0.64 |
| 25 | S1st Round· Oregon· model #22 | 0.64 |
| 26 | CB1st Round· Illinois· model #26 | 0.64 |
| 27 | Adam Trickrank#30$16.7M LB1st Round· Texas Tech· model #30 | 0.64 |
| 28 | Jamari Johnsonrank#21$20.7M TE1st Round· Oregon· model #21 | 0.64 |
| 29 | Jadan Baughrank#23$9.6M RB1st Round· Florida· model #23 | 0.63 |
| 30 | Sammy Brownrank#34$10M LBDay 2· Clemson· model #34 | 0.62 |
| 31 | A'Mauri Washingtonrank#27$17M DL1st Round· Oregon· model #27 | 0.62 |
| 32 | Ellis Robinson IVrank#32$7M CB1st Round· Georgia· model #32 | 0.61 |
| 33 | Darian Mensahrank#47 QBDay 2· Miami· model #47· critical need | 0.61 |
| 34 | Ryan Wingorank#28$23.1M WR1st Round· Texas· model #28 | 0.60 |
| 35 | Damon Wilson IIrank#53$10.7M EDGEDay 2· Miami· model #53· critical need | 0.59 |
| 36 | Quincy Rhodes Jr.rank#31$15.5M DL1st Round· Arkansas· model #31 | 0.59 |
| 37 | Ethan Wesloskirank#40$11.9M LBDay 2· Oklahoma State· model #40 | 0.59 |
| 38 | GDay 2· Ohio State· model #56· critical need | 0.59 |
| 39 | QBDay 2· Notre Dame· model #57· critical need | 0.58 |
| 40 | Will Heldtrank#58$14.1M EDGEDay 2· Clemson· model #58· critical need | 0.58 |
| 41 | LBDay 2· Penn State· model #42 | 0.58 |
| 42 | Nate Frazierrank#33$9.8M RBDay 2· Georgia· model #33 | 0.58 |
| 43 | CBDay 2· Alabama· model #39 | 0.58 |
| 44 | CBDay 2· Texas· model #41 | 0.58 |
| 45 | WRDay 2· Arizona State· model #35 | 0.57 |
| 46 | GDay 2· Oregon· model #64· critical need | 0.57 |
| 47 | Nick Marshrank#36$17.9M WRDay 2· Indiana· model #36 | 0.57 |
| 48 | EDGEDay 2· Oregon· model #66· critical need | 0.57 |
| 49 | OTDay 2· Miami· model #67· critical need | 0.57 |
| 50 | LBDay 2· Georgia· model #48 | 0.57 |
Norv-style vertical; Graham cover-3
What LV has committed against the projected NFL salary cap, year by year. Room-to-add is the headline number for evaluating their ability to extend rookies or chase free agents.
Las Vegas lists defensive front, secondary, and skill positions as its priorities — then the house mock hands it Cam Coleman, a receiver, at five. That's odd when Colin Simmons sits 4th on the model, 2nd in the room, an edge rusher who fits the trench need without a reach. KJ Bolden's gap cuts the other way: the room is far colder on the Georgia safety than the model, even though he'd fill the secondary hole this roster actually has. Coleman may be the flashier name, but he's not the only, or even the best, argument for this pick.
Written by our models from the live board, and reconciled against it
Prospects re-ranked for LV's offensive and defensive scheme. Green = climbed on this team's board; red = dropped. The base board is unchanged — this is a derived view.